When Tolerance Isn’t Tolerant: The Hypocrisy of Cancel Culture
Carrie Underwood, Inaugurations, and the Selective Outrage Machine
Carrie Underwood sang at the inauguration—and suddenly, she’s “problematic.” But why? Why does simply performing at a presidential event become a lightning rod for outrage? Because in today’s hyper-polarized world, tolerance often only extends to those who echo the dominant narrative of the moment.
But this isn’t just about one artist, one event, or one political side. This pattern plays out across the board—left, right, and everywhere in between. Whether it’s a celebrity, an influencer, or an everyday person, the cycle of selective outrage has become a weapon wielded by all sides, trapping us in a system that thrives on division and emotional reactivity.
The same voices that preach inclusivity and acceptance are often the first to cancel those who don’t align perfectly with their views. The result? A culture that rewards conformity and punishes independent thought.
But this isn’t new—it’s a well-worn tactic designed to divide, distract, and keep people emotionally invested in an illusion of moral superiority.
Let’s break it down.
Echo Chambers and Selective Outrage
(Related Feature: Echo Chambers: The Illusion of Consensus)
Social media algorithms have created a world where people are fed the same viewpoints over and over, reinforcing their beliefs and shaping their reality. When something contradicts that carefully curated reality—like a beloved singer performing for the “wrong” political figure—it sparks outrage.
Carrie Underwood isn’t the first and won’t be the last to face backlash. The same crowd that demands tolerance for all identities struggles to tolerate differing opinions or choices within their own ranks.
Why does this happen?
Because it’s easier to attack a person than to question your own beliefs.
Cognitive Dissonance: The Root of the Hypocrisy
People experience cognitive dissonance when they hold conflicting ideas—such as believing in free expression but feeling uncomfortable when someone they admire expresses support for a different ideology. Instead of reevaluating their stance, many react by attacking the “offender” to maintain internal consistency.
The thought process goes like this:
- “I believe my side is morally right.”
- “Carrie Underwood performed for the other side.”
- “She must be wrong, or I am.”
- "She’s wrong.”
And just like that, cancel culture strikes again.
The Rise of Performative Activism
Many times, the backlash isn’t even genuine—it’s performative. Public figures and influencers signal outrage to align with the crowd and avoid criticism themselves. In reality, they might not even care about the issue at hand.
It’s no longer about values—it’s about control.
Social media has turned activism into a form of entertainment, where “likes” and “shares” replace meaningful action. The more outrage, the more engagement.
The “Us vs. Them” Mentality: A Divide-and-Conquer Tactic
(Related Feature: Divide and Conquer: Why You’re Trained to Attack, Not Think)
Cancel culture thrives on division. By framing everything as “us vs. them,” it ensures people stay emotionally reactive, distracted, and compliant. Those who call out hypocrisy are dismissed, and the cycle continues.
The irony? The system uses both sides against each other.
Solution: Step back and ask—
-
Am I thinking for myself, or just reacting?
-
Do I truly believe in free expression, even when it’s inconvenient?
- Am I being manipulated into outrage for someone else’s gain?
How to Break Free from the Cycle
Instead of falling into the trap of selective outrage, here’s how to break free:
-
Recognize the Patterns: When you feel triggered, ask yourself why. Are you reacting emotionally, or is there a deeper issue at play?
-
Challenge Your Echo Chamber: Seek out perspectives that challenge your own, even if they make you uncomfortable.
-
Practice Real Tolerance: Tolerance means accepting differences, not just the ones you agree with.
- Use Critical Thinking: Before jumping on the cancel bandwagon, consider the bigger picture.
Final Thoughts: Tolerance Shouldn’t Be Conditional
The next time you see a public figure facing backlash for simply existing in a different space, take a moment to reflect. Are we promoting real unity, or are we fuelling the divide?
True tolerance isn’t just about accepting what’s easy—it’s about embracing the uncomfortable, the unfamiliar, and the inconvenient truths.
🔗 Share this if you believe real tolerance means accepting differing viewpoints, not just the ones that fit the narrative.
What do you think? Ready to make a change, or still stuck in the cycle?
AwakeApparel isn’t just about clothing—it’s about consciousness. We provide content that challenges the narrative, sparks critical thinking, and empowers people to see through the noise. If you value this mission, consider supporting us. Every share, purchase, and donation fuels the fight for true freedom of thought.
SUGGESTED NEXT READING:
OR CHECK OUT AWAKEWELLNESS:
